|
Speak Out
How will Osama bin Laden’s killing affect U.S. foreign policy?
Can you remember a time before terrorism was the nation’s constant fear?
From airport security to military spending, keeping the nation safe from extremists has been high on the national agenda ever since the attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., on Sept. 11, 2001.
When a team of Navy Seals entered a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, this weekend, killing 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden, America gained closure on a decade-long mission. But it also, in a way, lost its public enemy number one.
In the short term, there was a heightened state of security at some of the nation’s airports, as fears of immediate retaliation bubbled. This is expected to calm down, possibly to pre-9/11 levels; some airports did not even go on official alert, according to a report in the Christian Science Monitor.
In a broader sense, with bin Laden out of the picture, the 10-year-old military presence in Afghanistan – where bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terrorist network operates from – is being reexamined.
“Every question has to be on the table in terms of where this is going,” Sen. John Kerry said in the New York Times. “What this does is initiate a possibility for reevaluating what kind of transition we need in Afghanistan.”
In Afghanistan, some officials worry about what this means. Will the United States abandon the war it started, now that its primary target is dead? Since bin Laden was killed outside the country, will the United States cut back on counterterrorism attacks inside Afghanistan?
“For years we have said that the fight against terrorism is not in Afghan villages and houses,” Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai said in a statement. “Stop bombarding Afghan villages and searching Afghan people.”
Right now, a force of 100,000 U.S. troops is stationed in Afghanistan. President Obama’s plan, announced in 2009, is to draw down those numbers beginning this July, with a government turnover occurring in 2014. In a speech, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the United States is sticking to that plan. It will not abandon the war in Afghanistan, nor will it go easy on the Taliban unless it renounces al-Qaeda.
“Our message to the Taliban remains the same, but today, it may have even greater resonance,” Clinton said. “You cannot wait us out. You cannot defeat us. But you can make the choice to abandon al-Qaeda and participate in a peaceful political process.”
Experts believe that the Taliban may have more flexibility to do what Clinton asks. The Taliban has harbored al-Qaeda ever since bin Laden’s group helped Taliban forces during the Afghan civil war in the 1990s. However, the Taliban’s “debt of gratitude” was to bin Laden personally, a former CIA intelligence officer said.
Analysts also point out that continued success in the war on terrorism will require cooperation from Pakistan, the country that bin Laden was hiding out in. This may prove difficult since the U.S. raid that killed him was conducted without notifying Pakistani officials.
What do you think?
How will Osama bin Laden’s death affect the U.S. foreign policy? Should the United States speed up its exit from Afghanistan? Should it stick to its current timetable? Should the focus of counterterrorism efforts include other countries, not just the one harboring al-Qaeda? Do you agree with the U.S. decision not to include Pakistan in the raid that killed bin Laden? Join the discussion!
|
Join the Discussion
|
|
Related News
|
Related Resources
This Speak Out does not have any related resources
|
Share
|
|